As long time commenter (and now contributor) Ryan “THE” Conservative can attest, BccList.com was never about traffic/number of visitors when launched in May 2008.
Meaning, at one point, Ryan mentioned something like: “This blog will be up to 100,000 visitors in no time.” I was thinking — at the time — 1,000 visitors reading my therapeutic rants would be pretty cool. Well, Ryan, you were right (and thank you for continuing to read my diatribes)!
Here’s a link to my first few postings on May 24, 2008.
https://bcclist.com/2008/05/24/
And…
“Why the blog?”
https://bcclist.com/why-the-blog/
Yes, back in the day, I was an awkwardly bitter person — especially towards the likes of Hillary Clinton, Carl Icahn, and john mccain.
While I still have little tolerance for Tea Party bigots (I.e. Fox News), horribly designed websites/services (E.g. Hotmail), etc. I’m pleased to have focused my attention elsewhere as of late. Thank you for reading…here’s to the next 500,000 visitors!
Note: I completely understand 500,000 visitors in over 4 years — or about 350 visitors a day on average — isn’t phenomenal (and barely blog posting worthy). 🙂
you should be proud….i can’t even get my family interested in what i’ve got to say most days (haha) so to get that much traffic means you are doing ok. I think the recent focus of your blog has got you so many hits because of the fantastic work you have done and the great atmosphere you have provided. I think the standard you have set has attracted some really great minds and i love coming here to read what everyone has to say. Cheers !!
YOU have done FANTASTIC my friend, and yes, even though I don’t agree with everything you post, for instance anything regarding Barack Hussein Obama in a positive light or anything in favor of the criminal Trayvon Martin, this site is a shining example of free exchange of ideas and commentary. Keep up the good work, it’s an honor to post on a site that you post on. Good things.
“criminal Trayvon Martin”–wait..what? Never mind, would be just wasting my time (trolling , are we?)